Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy Between 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) for Prostate Cancer

Rong Wang

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy Between 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) for Prostate Cancer

Rong Wang （ Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200137, China ）

https://doi.org/10.37155/3060-8708-0102-4

Abstract

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in treating prostate cancer. Methods: Seventy prostate cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2024 were randomly divided into a control group (n = 35) and an observation group (n = 35). The control group underwent 2D-LRP, while the observation group received 3D-LRP. Results: Compared to the control group, the observation group demonstrated better therapeutic outcomes and a lower incidence of urinary incontinence (P < 0.05). The observation group also exhibited signifcantly reduced intraoperative blood loss, operative time, urethral reconstruction time, and catheterization duration (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared to 2D-LRP, 3D-LRP offers higher efficacy and safety in the treatment of prostate cancer, with added benefts for postoperative recovery.

Keywords

3D; 2D; Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy; Prostate Cancer

Full Text

PDF

References

[1] Chen Qiming, Chen Jian, Liu Qiuli, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and influencing factors between robot-assisted laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of the Army Medical University, 2024, 46(21): 2424-2431.
[2] Zhong Chao, Wang Junguang, Zhang Kecheng, et al. MRI classification of extracapsular invasion in prostate cancer and its prediction of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy, 2024, 21(10): 602-606.
[3] Zhang Liang, Lu Wenbao, Liao Xinxin, et al. Application of modified laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Chinese Contemporary Medicine, 2024, 31(28): 56-60.
[4] Jia Zixiao. Analysis of the pathogen distribution and drug resistance in urinary tract infections after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in elderly early-stage prostate cancer patients. Journal of
Xinxiang Medical University, 2024, 41(09): 862-866+873.
[5] Tang Xiayu, Yuan Renbin, Xi Xiang, et al. The application of non-suturing deep dorsal vein complex and traditional suturing in Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and its impact on prognosis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Physicians, 2024, 52(09): 1066-1068.
[6] Han Guangye, Ma Kuo, Song Weihang, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects and safety of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed at different times after prostate biopsy. Hainan Medical Journal, 2024, 35(16): 2320-2324.
[7] Liang Yuan, Hei Weixiang, Yang Yonggang, et al. Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Modern Medicine and Health Research Electronic Journal, 2024, 8(14): 67-70.

Publishing time:2024-08-30
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License