Home > Current

Analysis of Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Lijun Yang （ Weinan Second Hospital, Shaanxi 714000,China ）

Huajing Ha （ Weinan Second Hospital, Shaanxi 714000,China ）

Bingyi Li （ Weinan Second Hospital, Shaanxi 714000,China ）

https://doi.org/10.37155/2717-5278-2020-02-01-5

Abstract

Objective：To analysis of treatment effects and safety of retropubic approach and laparoscope approach of radical prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer. Methods：The observation group underwent radical prostatectomy by laparoscope approach,while the control group underwent radical prostatectomy by retropubic approach, after that, to analysis the operation indexes and complications of patients. Results：The intraoperative blood loss,length of stay and postoperative NRS score of observation group were less than control group, the operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group. with statistical significance (P＜0.05). The postoperative complication rate of observation group was lower than control group,with statistical significance (P＜0.05). Conclusion：Comparing with retropubic approach, laparoscope approach of radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer can improve the safety of surgical treatment and optimize surgical indicators,which is worthy of promotion.

Keywords

Localized prostate cancer; retropubic approach; laparoscope approach; radical prostatectomy; safety

Full Text

PDF

References

[1] Hao Zhang, Haibo Xia, Guochang Bao, Xiaoyu Liu. Retropubic approach in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder stones[J]. Inner Mongolia Medical Journal, 2010,42(S3):39-41.
[2] Jiayin Peng, Changqing Huang, Shaoqing Gao, Zhiren Cai, Zhaoguan Li. Clinical effect of different approaches in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and its influence on sexual function of patients[J]. China Practical Medicine, 2020,15(10):33-35.
[3]Jiaxing Li,Qi Zhang, Jianwei Xie, Bo Yin. Observation on the effect of early urinary control recovery after cystourethral anastomosis with double needle barb suture during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2020, 28(10):1703-1706.
[4] Cong Liu, Bing Chen, Wenjie Zhou, Zhenxing Hu. The influence of open surgery and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the quality of life and urodynamics of patients with early prostate cancer[J].The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2020, 35(02):248-251.
[5] Hao Du, Guanghai Yu, Yanlong Wang, Yu Ren. Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy combined with laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer and its influence on urinary control[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application, 2019,13(24):176-177.
[6] Chenhui Zhang, Haiwen Chen, Qian Li. Effect of laparoscopic intrafascial radical prostatectomy on urinary control and sexual function recovery in patients with prostate cancer of different ages[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2019, 34(12):2040-2043.
[7] Shijing Chen. Analysis of clinical effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy on patients with stage T_3N_0M_0 prostate cancer[J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2019, 25(35):12-14.
[8] Ximei Yang. Application of lean nursing mode in perioperative nursing of patients with high risk prostate cancer undergoing robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Psychological Monthly, 2019,14(23):152.

Copyright © Creative Commons License Publishing time:2020-10-30
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License