Home > Current

Exploring Informal–Formal Economy Linkages: New Evidence from the MIMIC Model Approach

Chigozie Chukwu （ University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom ）

Aleksandar Vasilev （ University of Lincoln, United Kingdom ）

Shrabani Saha （ University of Lincoln, United Kingdom ）

https://doi.org/10.37155/2972-4813-gep0303-7

Abstract

This study investigates the size, dynamics, and macroeconomic implications of the informal economy (IE) in Nigeria, using a structural macro-modelling approach. The motivation stems from persistent macroeconomic underperformance in Nigeria, even with its rich resource endowments. This situation raises important questions about the economic activities that go unaccounted for outside of formal systems. While existing literature recognizes the importance of the informal sector in developing economies, it often lacks detailed, country-specific modeling frameworks that weave the IE into broader macroeconomic analysis. This study aims to bridge that gap by constructing and estimating a macroeconomic model that explicitly includes the informal economy to understand its interactions with key macroeconomic variables. Using the Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model, the study measures the size of Nigeria’s informal economy and simulates the impacts of changes in macroeconomic policy variables. The findings reveal that the size of the IE ranged from 27.8% to 65.61% of the official GDP. However, its existence outside the tax and regulatory framework undermines fiscal performance and the effectiveness of monetary policy. Moreover, the model illustrates how shocks in the formal economy affect the informal economy differently, emphasizing the importance of dual-sector policy consideration. This study adds to the existing literature by offering a robust modeling framework for analyzing informality in an oil-dependent economy. The policy implications suggest that reforms in tax administration, financial inclusion, and targeted formalization strategies are essential for enhancing macroeconomic management and fostering inclusive growth in Nigeria.

Keywords

Informal economy; Multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC); Nigeria; Formal economy; Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model

Full Text

PDF

References

[1]. ANGOUR, N. & NMILI, M. 2019. Estimating shadow economy and tax evasion: Evidence from Morocco. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 11, 1-7.
[2]. BENNIHI, A. S., BOURICHE, L. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2021. The informal economy in Algeria: New insights using the MIMIC approach and the interaction with the formal economy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 72, 470-491.
[3]. BERNIELL, L. 2017. Occupational Choice and Investments in Human Capital in Informal Economies.
[4]. BOBBA, M., FLABBI, L., LEVY, S. & TEJADA, M. 2021. Labor market search, informality, and on-the-job human capital accumulation. Journal of Econometrics, 223, 433-453.
[5]. CHUKWU, C., VASILEV, A. & SAHA, S. 2024. Measuring Business Cycle Stylized Facts in Selected Oil-Producing Economies: A Comparative Study. Journal of Business Cycle Research, 20, 89-121.
[6]. CHUKWU, C., VASILEV, A. & SAHA, S. 2025. A Panel Analysis of Brent Oil Price Dynamics on Macroeconomic Effects: The Case of Some Selected Oil-Producing Countries. Journal of Economics, Business, and Commerce, 2, 29-47.
[7]. DELL’ANNO, R. & DAVIDESCU, A. A. 2018. Estimating shadow economy in Tanzania: an analysis with the MIMIC approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 45, 100-113.
[8]. DELL’ANNO, R., GÓMEZ-ANTONIO, M. & PARDO, A. 2007. The shadow economy in three Mediterranean countries: France, Spain and Greece. A MIMIC approach. Empirical Economics, 33, 51-84.
[9]. DELL’ANNO, R. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2003. The Shadow Economy of Italy and other OECD Countries: What do we know? Journal of public finance and public choice, 21, 97-120.
[10]. DOBRE, I. & ALEXANDRU, A. 2009. Estimating the size of the shadow economy in Japan: A structural model with latent variables. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 43, 67-82.
[11]. ELGIN, C. & ERTURK, F. 2019. Informal economies around the world: Measures, determinants and consequences. Eurasian Economic Review, 9, 221-237.
[12]. ENE, C.-M. & ŞTEFĂNESCU, A. 2011. SIZE AND IMPLICATION OF UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IN ROMANIA-A MIMIC APPROACH. Annales Universitatis Apulensis-Series Oeconomica, 13.
[13]. HASSAN, M. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2016a. Modelling the Egyptian shadow economy: A currency demand and a MIMIC model approach.
[14]. HASSAN, M. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2016b. Size and development of the shadow economies of 157 countries worldwide: Updated and new measures from 1999 to 2013.
[15]. HOA, N. T. 2019. How large is Vietnam's informal economy? Economic Affairs, 39, 81-100.
[16]. HUSSIEN, A. 2016. Understanding the total factor productivity shortfall in Sub-Saharan Africa.
[17]. MACIAS, J. B. & CAZZAVILLAN, G. 2010. Modeling the informal economy in Mexico. a structural equation approach. The Journal of Developing Areas, 345-365.
[18]. MAPP, T. & MOORE, W. 2015. The informal economy and economic volatility. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 8, 185-200.
[19]. MEDINA, L. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2017. Shadow economies around the world: New results for 158 countries over 1991-2015.
[20]. ODUH, M., EBOH, E., ICHOKU, H. & UJAH, O. 2008. Measurement and explanation of informal sector of the Nigerian economy. AIAE Research Paper, 3, 1-64.
[21]. OGBUABOR, J. E. & MALAOLU, V. 2013. Size and causes of the informal sector of the Nigerian economy: Evidence from error correction mimic model.
[22]. OTHMANE, B. & MAMA, H. 2016. An estimation of the informal economy in Morocco. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8, 140-147.
[23]. PESARAN, M. H., SHIN, Y. & SMITH, R. J. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16, 289-326.
[24]. SCHNEIDER, F. 2005. Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 598-642.
[25]. SCHNEIDER, F. 2010. The influence of public institutions on the shadow economy: An empirical investigation for OECD countries. Review of Law & Economics, 6, 441-468.
[26]. SCHNEIDER, F. 2022. Estimation of informal Economy: figurEs for DEvElopED anD unDErDEvElopED countriEs arounD thE WorlD. Revista de economía mundial, 41-65.
[27]. SCHNEIDER, F. & BUEHN, A. 2013. Estimating the size of the shadow economy: Methods, problems and open questions.
[28]. SCHNEIDER, F., BUEHN, A. & MONTENEGRO, C. E. 2010. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. International economic journal, 24, 443-461.
[29]. SCHNEIDER, F., CHAUDHURI, K. & CHATTERJEE, S. 2003. The size and development of the Indian shadow economy and a comparison with other 18 Asian countries: An empirical investigation. Working Paper.
[30]. SCHNEIDER, F. & ENSTE, D. H. 2000. Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of economic literature, 38, 77-114.
[31]. SMITH, P. 1994. lAssessing the Size of the Underground Economy: The Canadian Statistical Perspectives, mStatistics Canada. Cat.
[32]. TEDDS, L. M. & GILES, D. E. 2002. Taxes and the Canadian underground economy. Taxes and the Canadian underground economy, Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
[33]. TONUCHI, J. E. & IDOWU, P. 2020. How large is the size of Nigeria’s informal economy? A MIMIC approach. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management.
[34]. TORGLER, B. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2007. Shadow economy, tax morale, governance and institutional quality: a panel analysis.
[35]. TREVOR, B. 2005. Estimating the Underground Economy using the MIMIC Models. The Australian National University.
[36]. WILLIAMS, C. C. & SCHNEIDER, F. 2016. Measuring the Global Shadow Economy: the prevalence of informal work and labour, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Copyright © 2025 Chigozie Chukwu, Aleksandar Vasilev, Shrabani Saha Creative Commons License Publishing time:2025-07-28
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License