To What Extent Can a Grade II* Listed Building Be Converted into Energy-Efficient Eco-home

Emily Shaw; Mawada Abdellatif; Yassin Osman; Denise Lee

To What Extent Can a Grade II* Listed Building Be Converted into Energy-Efficient Eco-home

Emily Shaw （ Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK ）

Mawada Abdellatif （ Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK ）

Yassin Osman （ School of Engineering, University of Bolton; Bolton, BL3 5AB, UK ）

Denise Lee （ Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK ）

https://doi.org/10.37155/2811-0730-0301-8

Abstract

This research aims to determine the feasibility of converting a Grade II* listed building, built in 1667 and located within a conservation area in the UK, into an eco-home by reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions. The project explores the feasibility of facilitating a change of use from a commercial building into a residential dwelling while significantly improving the energy performance. A baseline energy performance assessment is carried out using a combination of infrared thermography, monitoring of hygrothermal conditions, and thermal modelling. Different retrofitting options are applied, and the results are compared to the standard benchmarks. Hygrothermal conditions are compared to the recommended comfort level temperatures as defined in Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) Guide A. The retrofitting options showed that the building could be modified to a level that shows a performance that is more favourable than the benchmarks in two out of the three benchmark measurements. Suggested improvements are sensitive to the status of the building, location, hygrothermal behaviour, and comfort level.

Keywords

Comfort level; Energy efficiency; IES; Listed buildings; Low Carbon; Thermal camera

Full Text

PDF

References

[1] MULHEIRN, I. 2019. Tackling the UK housing crisis: is supply the answer. UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence.
Available:https://www.institute.global/insights/geopolitics-and-security/tackling-uk-housing-crisis-supply-answer-summary [Accessed on 19th July 2021].
[2] HOME BUILDERS FEDERATION. 2017. New build homes save owners £629 a year on energy bills [Online]. Available: https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/new-build-homes-save-owners-629-a-year-on-energy-bills/ [Accessed on 19th July 2021].
[3] NEW-HOMES. 2020. Customer Protection [Online]. Available: https://www.new-homes.co.uk/why-buy-new/customer-protection/ [Accessed on 19th July 2021].
[4] Grant A and Ries R. Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment. Building Research & Information, 2013; 41(2):168-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.730735
[5] KOLLEWE, J. 2017. More than half of new-build homes in England ‘have major faults’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2017/mar/02/new-build-homes-major-faults-best-city-cycle-schemes
[6] Berg F and Fuglseth M. Life cycle assessment and historic buildings: energy-efficiency refurbishment versus new construction in Norway. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 2018; 24(2):152-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2018.1493664
[7] Gong Y and Song D. Life cycle building carbon emissions assessment and driving factors decomposition analysis based on LMDI—A case study of Wuhan City in China. Sustainability, 2015, 7(12):16670-16686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215838
[8] : Zhour F, Abdellatif M, Osman Y, et al. Comparison between the life cycle carbon footprint of refurbished and new buildings: A case study of Community Centre. Journal of Building Design and Environment, 2023;2(1):13597. http://doi.org/10.37155/2811-0730-0201-4
[9] HISTORIC ENGLAND. 2021. Old Grammar School, to rear of numbers 8-14 (numbers 8-14 not included) [Online]. Available: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1220218 [Accessed 18th March 2021].
[10]THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERS 2021. Environmental Design CIBSE Guide A. https://www.cibse.org/knowledge-research/knowledge-portal/guide-a-environmental-design-2015
[11] Hailu G and Fung A S. Optimum tilt angle and orientation of photovoltaic thermal system for application in greater Toronto area, Canada. Sustainability, 2019; 11(22): 6443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226443
[12] RENEWABLES FIRST. 2015. How windy does it have to be? [Online]. Available: https://www.renewablesfirst.co.uk/windpower/windpower-learning-centre/how-windy-does-it-have-to-be/ [Accessed 25th August 2021].
[13] PILKINGTON. 2019. Listed building transformed with new energy efficient Pilkington Spacia glazing [Online]. Available: https://www.pilkington.com/en-gb/uk/news-insights/featured-articles/listed-building-transformed-with-new-energy-efficient-pilkington-spacia-glazing [Accessed 25th August 2021].
[14] UK GOVERNMENT. 2021. Government conversion factors for company reporting of greenhouse gas emissions [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-conversion-factors-for-company-reporting [Accessed 25th August 2021].
[15] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE 2014. Assessing the cost effectiveness of individual metering: Energy demand benchmarks. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e1520e5274a2e8ab45b9e/EED_regs_-_benchmark_heat_demand_paper_-_261114_.pdf [Accessed on 19th August 2021].
[16] THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERS 2008. Energy Benchmarks TM46: 2008. Available: https://quidos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/CIBSE-TM46-Energy- Benchmarks.compressed.pdf
[Accessed on 19th August 2021].

Publishing time:2024-01-17
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License