CLT-based Curricula and Pedagogical Recommendations in EFL Contexts: A Textual Analysis of the 10th-grade English Curriculum in Burkina Faso

J. Somé Kountiala

doi:https://doi.org/10.37155/2972-4856-jei0301-2

CLT-based Curricula and Pedagogical Recommendations in EFL Contexts: A Textual Analysis of the 10th-grade English Curriculum in Burkina Faso

J. Somé Kountiala （ Illinois State University, School of Teaching and Learning, 100 N University St Normal, IL 61761, USA ）

https://doi.org/10.37155/2972-4856-jei0301-2

Abstract

This study critically evaluates the 10th-grade English as a Foreign Language (EFL) curriculum in Burkina Faso to understand some of the implementation challenges reported in most empirical research about teachers’ use of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) principles. For this purpose, the article reviewed the literature on CLT principles, its theoretical background, and the pedagogical implications in multilingual contexts. Empirical research on implementing CLT-based curricula in different EFL contexts was also reviewed to identify common issues highlighted regarding CLT curricula implementation in EFL contexts. These reviews helped define the methodological guideline for this critical assessment of the CLT-based grade 10 EFL curriculum in Burkina Faso. It leads to a thorough examination of the grade 10 curriculum, whose findings indicate a lack of contextualization of CLT principles in the curriculum to reflect the national and local teaching and learning realities in Burkina Faso. The analysis reveals that the 10th-grade EFL curriculum prescribes specific topics, lesson content, and instruction time, leaving teachers with little autonomy to adapt lessons to students’ needs and community realities. The control of what teachers can do regarding teaching and learning planning reduces teachers to policy implementers rather than facilitators of learning. To address these challenges, the article recommends a collaborative approach to curriculum design and implementation in which teachers serve as the last-mile planners. Granting this role to teachers can ensure that students’ needs and local realities are considered in curriculum planning, implementation, and assessment.

Keywords

Communicative Language Teaching(CLT); Constructivism; EFL; CLT Principles

Full Text

PDF

References

[1].Gulzar A A. Factors affecting curriculum development. Educare;2021. https://educarepk.com/factors-affecting-curriculum-development.html
[2].Memoria Press. What Is Curriculum in Classical Education? | Martin Cothran | Classical Et Cetera [Episode 013] [Video];2021, April 8. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7qfHYXUqmY
[3].Brownell CJ. Starting where you are, revisiting what you know: A letter to a first-year teacher addressing the hidden curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. 2017;14(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2017.1398697
[4].Richards JC. Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal. 2013;44(1):5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
[5].Pitychoutis K, Pitychoutis K. Designing a teacher orientation course for English as a foreign language faculty at Saudi Arabian universities: The case of a private university in Riyadh;2020. https://core.ac.uk/download/573844699.pdf
[6].Wette R. Product-process distinctions in ELT curriculum theory and practice. ELT Journal. 2011;65(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq022
[7].INSD. Cinquième Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitation du Burkina Faso. MINEFID;2022.
[8].Yoda B, Tapsoba AC. Burkina Faso's language policy and the politics of promoting local languages. Language Policy. 2015;14(1):1-20.
[9].MENAPL. Curricula du Post-Primaire Discipline : Anglais. Burkina Faso;2021.
[10].Jebahi K. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching and Learning over Time. Language & Literacy (Kingston, Ont.). 2022;24(3):88–106. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29595
[11].Han I. Contextualization of Communicative Language Teaching in Confucian Heritage Culture: Challenging Pedagogic Dichotomization. SAGE Open, 2022;12(1):215824402210798-. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079895
[12].Breithorde ML, Swiniarski L. Constructivism and reconstructionism: educating teachers for world citizenship. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 1999;24(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1999v24n1.1
[13].Wright WE. Foundations for Teaching English Language Learners: Research, Theory, Policy, and Practice. 3rd ed. Brookes Publishing;2019.
[14].Brameld T. Patterns of educational philosophy; divergence and convergence in culturological perspective. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston;1971.
[15].Humphries S, Burns A. “In Reality It”s Almost Impossible’: CLT-Oriented Curriculum Change. ELT Journal, 2015;69(3):239–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu081.
[16].Han I. Implementation of CLT-based curriculum and consideration of negotiated pedagogy in Korea. Modern English Education, 2016;17(3):25–52.
[17].Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder;1970).
[18].Nagy IK, Kovács G. Discrepancies between CLT Principles and the Romanian Language and Literature for Hungarian Minority Curriculum and Its Implementation. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Seria Philologica. 2022;14(2):15–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0013.
[19].Council of Europe. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Companion volume. 2020.
[20].World-readiness standards for learning languages. 4th ed. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project;2015.
[21].Graves K, Garton S. An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching. 2017;50(4):441–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000155
[22].WIDA. WIDA English language development standards framework, 2020 edition: Kindergarten–grade 12. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System;2020.
[23].TESOL International Association. PreK-12 English language proficiency standards. (2006). Foreign language study;2006.
[24].Haider MZ, Chowdhury TA. Repositioning of CLT from Curriculum to Classroom: A Review of the English Language Instructions at Bangladeshi Secondary Schools. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2012;2(4):12–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n4p12.
[25].Rahman MM, Pandian A. A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of Communicative Language Teaching. English Today. 2018;34(3):43–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841700061X.
[26].Somé-Guiébré E. Implementing Communicative Approaches in English Language Teaching: The Case of Burkina Faso. International Journal of English Language Studies. I-JELS. 2021;3(11): https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2021.3.11.6.
[27].Lee MW. Will Communicative Language Teaching Work? Teachers’ Perceptions Toward the New Educational Reform in South Korea. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2014;3(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i2.265.
[28].Diouani AE. Communicative Language Teaching in the Moroccan Classroom: Perception, Practices, and Difficulties. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Learning. 2020;5(2):135–154. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5251.
[29].Yung KWH. Engaging Exam-Oriented Students in Communicative Language Teaching by “Packaging” Learning English through Songs as Exam Practice. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2023;54(1):280–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220978542.
[30].Zongo A, Somé-Guiébré E. Analyzing English Language Teaching Practices in Burkina Faso: A Sociocultural Perspective. Creative Education. 2021;12:2687-2699. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.1211199
[31].Diallo I. English in education policy shift in Senegal: From traditional pedagogies to communicative language teaching. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning. 2014;9(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082027
[32].Biseko JM, Manyilizu M, Mwaipape J, Nyinge D, Utenga A. Curriculum materials as a barrier to using a communicative approach to English language teaching in EFL context: examples from Tanzania. Journal of Applied Studies in Language. 2020;4(1):19–37. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v3i2.1377.
[33].Somé KJ. Teachers’ Agency and Teaching Challenges in Multilingual Spaces: An Exploratory Study of How EFL Teachers Address Listening and Speaking Skills Needs in Centralized Systems. TESL-EJ (Berkeley, Calif.). 2025;28(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28112a7
[34].Somé-Guiébré E. Foreign language classroom Interaction: Does it promote communicative skills? International Journal of Educational Methodology. 2020;6(3):497-505. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.497

Publishing time:2025-03-30
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License